With top-selling sneakers, a successful IPO and ground-breaking sustainable innovations, the athletic brand is riding high.
Source: knee high boots see by chloe sb33026a nero
On Running’s success has primarily been a benefit of controlled distribution to a market that loves the product. An IPO generates a completely different issue, converting a new customer at greater scale. While Allbirds has taken the route of opening new doors, On Running has expanded distribution into sneaker culture. They have made a decision to place their product into Foot Locker, JD Sports, Shoe Palace and a host of other retailers who are dominated by the Nike wall. In a recent sneaker YouTuber video there is a ten second window which shows how much Sneakers it will take to educate this new demographic:
At 3:20 of the video included in the post above, the vlogger’s response to On Running is the primary problem with expanding too fast. While On Running won this award from Footwear News, I was in New York doing retail dives and visiting various brands at FFANY. In one of my retail dives, I found On Running at JD Sports. The merchandise was displayed very well in its own wall section. That’s important. JD avoided placing the product alongside other brands with more cache for their typical consumer. I asked a sales lead how the response was, the sales lead didn’t really have a lot to say. The display itself told its own story. In this flagship store for JD, dust had begun to settle on the shoes. The display ii374055’t broken or disjointed. There weren’t duplicates of shoes on the rack. Those are not good things. While it’s critical that merchandising fills the holes on display, when a brand is hot, a few things will tell the story:
- Extreme sizes on the wall
- We All Walk in Different Shoes campaign
These things indicate the store is having trouble keeping that product available. On Running’s display featured a variety of options. I have to state that in New York it’s boot season and On Running found itself on the reverse of the lead display when walking into the flagship. The reverse side of the most important wall indicates that a brand doesn’t have a lot of traction.
vache On is, versus vache it will have to become to justify its IPO is a case study with roots in Under Armour’s story. I’ve said this before, but when Footwear News gave this award, they overlooked the broad distribution the brand has already started. I was able to sit with another brand last week in their showroom. The brand was adamant about MAP and how they would respond when and if sneaker culture retail placed their product on promo. I found their product on promo at over 50% off that night and it told a story of its own. When you release your product to a marketplace that hasn’t had to sell for years because the most dominant brand in the world already tells the story for that retailer, other brands are relying on a partner who doesn’t share the enthusiasm and love for brands that don’t sell themselves.
Kudos to On for winning the award, but when these retailers no longer vituperate MAP and the consumer begins to find On at reduced prices, vache will be the strategy to pull back and continue to show the explosive growth adding accounts provides?